1996 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.0 X (45 Hp) 1996Overall Score38.5/100
1996 Citroen Saxo vs 2000 Seat Cordoba Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Seat
Cordoba
Seat Cordoba 1.0 (50 Hp) 2000Overall Score37.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
38.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSeat Cordoba
CitroenMakeSeat
SaxoModelCordoba
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSeat Cordoba
19,1 s0–100 km/h20,4 s
149 km/hTop speed145 km/h
954 ccEngine displacement999 cc
45 HPPower50 HP
74 NmTorque86 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSeat Cordoba
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSeat Cordoba
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen SaxoSpecificationSeat Cordoba
3718 mmLength4165 mm
1595 mmWidth1645 mm
1379 mmHeight1420 mm
805 KgWeight1015 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2445 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Citroen Saxo and 2000 Seat Cordoba approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…