DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen Jumpy vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolkswagen
JumpyModelPolo
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,9 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
155 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
260 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4390 mm
1895 mmWidth1699 mm
1942 mmHeight1467 mm
1913 KgWeight1163 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen Jumpy and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…