DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Citroen Jumpy vs 2013 FAW Besturn X80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFAW
JumpyModelBesturn X80
2013Model year2013
MPVBody typeSUV
9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
163 HPPower147 HP
340 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4586 mm
1895 mmWidth1820 mm
1942 mmHeight1695 mm
1920 KgWeight1500 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Citroen Jumpy and 2013 FAW Besturn X80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…