2010 • Citroen
Jumpy
Citroen Jumpy 2.0 HDi (130 Hp) 2010Overall Score48.25/100
2010 Citroen Jumpy vs 2010 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (163 Hp) 2010Overall Score49/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen JumpySpecificationFord Kuga
CitroenMakeFord
JumpyModelKuga
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSUV
3Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Citroen JumpySpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
130 HPPower163 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen JumpySpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen JumpySpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R16CTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen JumpySpecificationFord Kuga
—Length4443 mm
—Width1842 mm
—Height1710 mm
—Weight1692 Kg
—Wheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Citroen Jumpy and 2010 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…