DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Citroen Jumpy vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSaab
JumpyModel9-3
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R16CTyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4635 mm
—Width1762 mm
—Height1466 mm
—Weight1440 Kg
—Wheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Citroen Jumpy and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…