DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Acura Integra vs 1991 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeMazda
IntegraModelCronos
1990Model year1991
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1678 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
162 HPPower140 HP
159 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4392 mmLength4695 mm
1714 mmWidth1770 mm
1270 mmHeight1400 mm
1205 KgWeight1170 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Acura Integra and 1991 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…