DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Citroen CX vs 1993 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

41.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen CXSpecificationVolvo 940
CitroenMakeVolvo
CXModel940
1989Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen CXSpecificationVolvo 940
16,8 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
149 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
75 HPPower82 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen CXSpecificationVolvo 940
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen CXSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen CXSpecificationVolvo 940
4650 mmLength4871 mm
1770 mmWidth1750 mm
1360 mmHeight1411 mm
1370 KgWeight1330 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Citroen CX and 1993 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…