DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Citroen CX vs 1989 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

41.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
CXModelXM
1989Model year1989
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
149 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2138 cc
75 HPPower82 HP
153 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4650 mmLength4710 mm
1770 mmWidth1795 mm
1360 mmHeight1385 mm
1370 KgWeight1305 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Citroen CX and 1989 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…