DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Citroen C8 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C8SpecificationSaab 9-3
CitroenMakeSaab
C8Model9-3
2002Model year2002
Minivan, MPVBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Citroen C8SpecificationSaab 9-3
14,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
174 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
109 HPPower130 HP
270 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C8SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C8SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C8SpecificationSaab 9-3
4727 mmLength4629 mm
1854 mmWidth1711 mm
1766-1856 mmHeight1428 mm
1710 KgWeight1295 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Citroen C8 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…