DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Citroen C6 vs 2009 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C6SpecificationSaab 9-3
CitroenMakeSaab
C6Model9-3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Citroen C6SpecificationSaab 9-3
10,3 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
217 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower175 HP
370 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C6SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C6SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17; 245/45 R18Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C6SpecificationSaab 9-3
4908 mmLength4635 mm
1860 mmWidth1762 mm
1464 mmHeight1466 mm
1821 KgWeight1440 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Citroen C6 and 2009 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…