DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Citroen C5 vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolvo
C5ModelXC90
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
235 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
235 HPPower272 HP
320 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,0 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
225/40 R18Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4839 mmLength4800 mm
1780 mmWidth1890 mm
1511 mmHeight1740 mm
1619 KgWeight2100 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Citroen C5 and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…