DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen C5 vs 2003 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
C5ModelMaverick
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
180 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
90 HPPower124 HP
236 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R15S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4618 mmLength4394 mm
1770 mmWidth1781 mm
1476 mmHeight1722 mm
1360 KgWeight1470 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen C5 and 2003 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…