DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C4 vs 2012 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeGreat Wall
C4ModelCowry
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
154 HPPower143 HP
199 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4574 mm
1799 mmWidth1704 mm
1625-1635 mmHeight1845 mm
1365 KgWeight1510 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C4 and 2012 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…