DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen C3-XR vs 2016 Ford S-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3-XR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
C3-XRModelS-Max
2016Model year2016
CrossoverBody typeMpv
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
209 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
167 HPPower160 HP
245 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
4Gears6
—TransmissionManual
205/60 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4262 mmLength4796 mm
1748 mmWidth1916 mm
1557 mmHeight1655 mm
1270 KgWeight1645 kg
—Luggage capacity755 lt
2655 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford S-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen C3-XR and 2016 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3-XR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…