DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Acura Integra vs 1986 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeMazda
IntegraModel323
1986Model year1986
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
115 HPPower75 HP
134 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption10 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size"155/80 R13 82S "

Dimensions

4280 mmLength—
1665 mmWidth—
1345 mmHeight—
1069 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Acura Integra and 1986 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…