DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Citroen C3 vs 2011 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationNissan AD
CitroenMakeNissan
C3ModelAD
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationNissan AD
8,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
120 HPPower109 HP
160 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank41 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationNissan AD
3941 mmLength4395 mm
1728 mmWidth1695 mm
1524 mmHeight1500 mm
1075 KgWeight—
2466 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Citroen C3 and 2011 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…