DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Citroen C3 vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo S60
CitroenMakeVolvo
C3ModelS60
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo S60
11,8 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
92 HPPower115 HP
230 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank67 lt
4,1 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EGSGears6
185/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo S60
3941 mmLength4628 mm
1728 mmWidth1865 mm
1524 mmHeight1484 mm
1170 KgWeight1488 Kg
2466 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Citroen C3 and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…