DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen C3 vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMitsubishi
C3ModelASX
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
190 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
99 HPPower115 HP
254 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank63 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
3,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16 98H; 215/60R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3941 mmLength4295 mm
1728 mmWidth1770 mm
1538 mmHeight1615 mm
1085 KgWeight1275 Kg
2466 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen C3 and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…