DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen C3 vs 2011 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

47.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeNissan
C3ModelMicra
2004Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
180 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
88 HPPower80 HP
133 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank41 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R14; 175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength3780 mm
1667 mmWidth1675 mm
1529 mmHeight1525 mm
1045 KgWeight910 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen C3 and 2011 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…