DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Citroen C3 vs 2015 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.

53.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeNissan
C3ModelMicra
2010Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
163 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
68 HPPower80 HP
160 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
185/65 R15Tyre size14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3941 mmLength3825 mm
1728 mmWidth1665 mm
1524 mmHeight1510 mm
1065 KgWeight945 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2466 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Citroen C3

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Citroen C3 and 2015 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…