DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Citroen C3 vs 2004 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
C3ModelSaxo
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

15,9 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
153 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
94 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,00 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3934 mmLength3718 mm
1700 mmWidth1595 mm
1563 mmHeight1390 mm
1085 KgWeight780 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Citroen C3 and 2004 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…