DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen C3 vs 2003 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakePerodua
C3ModelKenari
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

15,9 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
153 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement989 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
94 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,00 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3934 mmLength3460 mm
1700 mmWidth1475 mm
1563 mmHeight1665 mm
1085 KgWeight845 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen C3 and 2003 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…