DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen C2 vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C2SpecificationMazda 3
CitroenMakeMazda
C2Model3
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Citroen C2SpecificationMazda 3
8,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
202 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
122 HPPower109 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C2SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C2SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C2SpecificationMazda 3
3666 mmLength4420 mm
1659 mmWidth1755 mm
1474 mmHeight1465 mm
1070 KgWeight1275 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen C2 and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…