DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen C2 vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
C2ModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
122 HPPower109 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3666 mmLength4330 mm
1659 mmWidth1820 mm
1474 mmHeight1600 mm
1070 KgWeight1292 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen C2 and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…