DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Citroen C2 vs 2008 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
CitroenMakeVolvo
C2ModelV50
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
109 HPPower100 HP
147 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C2SpecificationVolvo V50
3666 mmLength4522 mm
1659 mmWidth1845 mm
1477 mmHeight1457 mm
1065 KgWeight1335 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Citroen C2 and 2008 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…