DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C1 vs 2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeChery
C1ModelSweet (QQ)
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

15,6 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
154 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
54 HPPower53 HP
130 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3435 mmLength3550 mm
1630 mmWidth1508 mm
1465 mmHeight1491 mm
890 KgWeight850 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C1 and 2012 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…