DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2012 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolkswagen
C-CrosserModelScirocco
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
190 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
232 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4256 mm
1806 mmWidth1810 mm
1715 mmHeight1404 mm
1650 KgWeight1395 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C-Crosser and 2012 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…