DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMitsubishi
C-CrosserModelASX
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
170 HPPower147 HP
232 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4295 mm
1806 mmWidth1770 mm
1715 mmHeight1615 mm
1650 KgWeight1520 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C-Crosser and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…