DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2009 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.

70.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolvo
C-CrosserModelS40
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
156 HPPower170 HP
380 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4468 mm
1806 mmWidth1770 mm
1715 mmHeight1452 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1368 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Citroen C-Crosser and 2009 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…