DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2009 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

70.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolvo
C-CrosserModelC70
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
200 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
156 HPPower220 HP
380 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4582 mm
1806 mmWidth1820 mm
1715 mmHeight1400 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1651 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Citroen C-Crosser and 2009 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…