DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2009 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.

70.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeKia
C-CrosserModelOptima
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
156 HPPower177 HP
380 NmTorque229 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4800 mm
1806 mmWidth1805 mm
1715 mmHeight1480 mm
1790-1825 KgWeight1432 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Citroen C-Crosser and 2009 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…