DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Citroen AX vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen AX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeZastava
AXModelYugo
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

17,9 s0–100 km/h20,1 s
145 km/hTop speed135 km/h
954 ccEngine displacement903 cc
45 HPPower45 HP
72 NmTorque63 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/70 R13Tyre size135/85 R13

Dimensions

3525 mmLength3490 mm
1555 mmWidth1540 mm
1355 mmHeight1340 mm
668 KgWeight750 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Citroen AX and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen AX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…