1990 • Alfa Romeo
75
Alfa Romeo 75 3.0 V6 (188 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Alfa Romeo 75 vs 1990 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 75SpecificationFord Aerostar
Alfa RomeoMakeFord
75ModelAerostar
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Alfa Romeo 75SpecificationFord Aerostar
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
188 HPPower147 HP
245 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 75SpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank79 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 75SpecificationFord Aerostar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 75SpecificationFord Aerostar
4420 mmLength4440 mm
1660 mmWidth1820 mm
1400 mmHeight1850 mm
1300 KgWeight1530 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Alfa Romeo 75 and 1990 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…