DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chrysler Voyager vs 2014 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMitsubishi
VoyagerModelASX
2016Model year2014
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
183 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
147 HPPower147 HP
214 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size215/60 R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4808 mmLength4295 mm
1997 mmWidth1770 mm
1803 mmHeight1615 mm
1905 KgWeight1520 Kg
2878 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chrysler Voyager and 2014 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…