DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chrysler Vision vs 1996 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeToyota
VisionModel4runner
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
214 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3378 cc
211 HPPower183 HP
288 NmTorque294 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt
14 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size225/75 R15; 265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5121 mmLength4539 mm
1890 mmWidth1689 mm
1434 mmHeight1689-1745 mm
1615 KgWeight1740 Kg
2873 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chrysler Vision and 1996 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…