DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chrysler Stratus vs 1996 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Stratus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeLand Rover
StratusModelRange Rover
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
163 HPPower136 HP
218 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank100 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
185//65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4746 mmLength4713 mm
1822 mmWidth1853 mm
1374 mmHeight1817 mm
1431 KgWeight2115 Kg
2747 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chrysler Stratus and 1996 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Stratus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…