DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs 2010 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFiat
PT CruiserModelBravo
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
176 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
157 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank57 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4336 mm
1705 mmWidth1792 mm
1600 mmHeight1498 mm
1370 KgWeight1320 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser and 2010 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler PT Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…