DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2003 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeJeep
PacificaModelWrangler
2004Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
218 HPPower183 HP
323 NmTorque301 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank57 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5052 mmLength3886 mm
2013 mmWidth1693 mm
1688 mmHeight1767 mm
2015 KgWeight1495 Kg
2954 mmWheelbase2373 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Pacifica and 2003 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…