DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2002 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFord
PacificaModelExplorer
2004Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
218 HPPower208 HP
323 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4530 mm
2013 mmWidth1790 mm
1688 mmHeight1800 mm
2015 KgWeight1670 Kg
2954 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Pacifica and 2002 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…