DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFord
PacificaModelExplorer
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
7-8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
3605 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
291 HPPower340 HP
355 NmTorque485 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
9Gears6 SelectShift
235/65 R17; 235/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5176 mmLength5019 mm
2022 mmWidth1988 mm
1777 mmHeight1788 mm
1964 KgWeight—
3089 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chrysler Pacifica and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…