1996 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Chrysler Neon vs 1996 Suzuki Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 2.0 i V6 24V (136 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler NeonSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
ChryslerMakeSuzuki
NeonModelVitara
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Chrysler NeonSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
8,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler NeonSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler NeonSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler NeonSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
4364 mmLength4125 mm
1714 mmWidth1695 mm
1369 mmHeight1695 mm
—Weight1310 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Chrysler Neon and 1996 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…