DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Intrepid vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeOpel
IntrepidModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed232 km/h
3231 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
228 HPPower218 HP
305 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5174 mmLength4898 mm
1900 mmWidth1776 mm
1420 mmHeight1540 mm
1630 KgWeight1733 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Intrepid and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…