DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Intrepid vs 2004 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Intrepid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeLand Rover
IntrepidModelFreelander
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
200 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
203 HPPower177 HP
258 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5174 mmLength4433 mm
1900 mmWidth1809 mm
1420 mmHeight1709 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Intrepid and 2004 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Intrepid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…