DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Crossfire

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.5–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeBMW
CrossfireModelZ3
2005Model year2003
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
255 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement3246 cc
330 HPPower325 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/40 R18; 255/35 R19Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4058 mmLength4025 mm
1766 mmWidth1740 mm
1296 mmHeight1268 mm
1455 KgWeight1450 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2459 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Chrysler Crossfire and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Crossfire leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…