DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Chrysler Concorde vs 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeOldsmobile
ConcordeModelCutlass
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3340 cc
214 HPPower162 HP
300 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
205/70 R15Tyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5152 mmLength4555 mm
1890 mmWidth1700 mm
1429 mmHeight1330 mm
1542 KgWeight1200 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Chrysler Concorde and 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…