DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Concorde vs 2006 Hummer H3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hummer H3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeHummer
ConcordeModelH3
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeOff-road araç, SUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

225 km/hTop speed158 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3653 cc
258 HPPower245 HP
348 NmTorque328 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank87 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size265/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4742 mm
1890 mmWidth1897 mm
1435 mmHeight1872 mm
1690 KgWeight2132 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2842 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Concorde and 2006 Hummer H3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hummer H3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…