DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Chrysler Concorde vs 1997 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMercury
ConcordeModelSable
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3301 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
163 HPPower147 HP
245 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5152 mmLength5070 mm
1890 mmWidth1850 mm
1429 mmHeight1410 mm
1534 KgWeight1535 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Chrysler Concorde and 1997 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…