DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chrysler Concorde vs 1999 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeChrysler
ConcordeModelConcorde
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3231 ccEngine displacement3231 cc
228 HPPower228 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
15 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5310 mm
1900 mmWidth1900 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
1570 KgWeight1570 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chrysler Concorde and 1999 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…