DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chrysler Concorde vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeVolkswagen
ConcordeModelSharan
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
187 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
203 HPPower204 HP
258 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption14,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/60 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4634 mm
1900 mmWidth1810 mm
1420 mmHeight1730 mm
1570 KgWeight1840 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2841 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chrysler Concorde and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…