DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Chrysler Concorde vs 1998 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeDaewoo
ConcordeModelMusso
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
187 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
203 HPPower220 HP
258 NmTorque307 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size255/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4640 mm
1900 mmWidth1864 mm
1420 mmHeight1735 mm
1570 KgWeight1935 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Chrysler Concorde and 1998 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…